Body dissatisfaction. In order to measure body dissatisfaction (difference between actual and ideal figure) and internalization of the ideal thin figure (defined as the selection of a thin silhouette from a group of silhouettes of various body sizes), a set of 10 silhouettes assumed to be neutral to ethnicity, culture, and details (Figure 1) was used. A German work group (Jaeger, Massoubre & Lamprecht, 2000) originally developed these for a previous multi-cross-cultural study in a three-stage peer revision procedure. Four questions were asked in relation to the silhouette scales: “Please mark with a cross the TailandГ©s mujeres sexy silhouette that best represents the current shape of your body”; “What do you wish you looked like?”; “What is the most attractive silhouette in your opinion?”; “What do you find the most attractive silhouette in the opposite sex?” Participants were asked to mark with a cross the position representing their attitudes on a 0-10 decimal scale (Figure 1); positions between the two silhouettes were allowed and coded as real numbers. tt= 0.82 (“actual”); Rtt= 0.77 (“ideal”); Rtt= 0.71 (“attractive”); and those of convergent validity as: Rcit= 0.73 (“actual” and BMI). The procedures followed by the authors, as well as the psychometric features, are described in detail elsewhere (Jaeger et al., 2002; Jaeger et al., 2000).
Weightloss discipline is measured because of the Weight loss Level of your own Food Perceptions Decide to try (EAT) (Garner, Olmsted, Bohr & Garfinkel, 1982), made up of 16 comments obtained to your a great six-section size (never ever = 0/usually = 5), having large ratings demonstrating an advanced level off controlled food. Towards Consume psychometrical properties come across Gather mais aussi al. (1982). The structure coefficient both for examples, the Mexican and you will Italian language of those, is of the identical really worth, a leader away from 0.76.
Dieting discipline
Ineffectiveness size. The fresh negative affect basis was estimated through the Ineffectiveness Scale out-of the newest Food Disorders Index (EDI) (Gather ainsi que al., 1983), that has shown a beneficial convergent authenticity (ineffectiveness/self-confidence ) away from Roentgen = 0.70 (p
Medical staff took the weight and you may peak methods
Bmi (BMI). Body mass index is determined given that lbs for the kilograms divided because of the peak when you look at the rectangular meters (Bmi = kg/m2).
In advance of research range, a great pilot examination of the new Silhouettes Measure (Contour 1), used on a sample including 20 North american country people, was used to test the brand new appropriateness of one’s data so you’re able to portray body types, to validate an excellent acceptation of an as yet not known number of silhouettes and you may an obvious understanding of the advice (the fresh Italian language category currently counted with data inside regard). The outcomes exhibited the new Shape Size is actually an effective otherwise an suitable tool into Mexican sample.
The investigators of these two places, during the Mexico Town at Hae (standardized) procedure. The fresh questionnaires was in fact applied to categories of medical and you may nursing youngsters at the North american country and German universities. One reason why at the rear of new ples of children connected with treatments try precisely the attention you to definitely (one could guess) such young adults have to have into the scientific field as well as for illnesses, leading them to much more attentive to troubles such ED. Told concur try extracted from all the investigation members. Every called college students wanted to take part. New particular local ethics committees recognized this new low-invasive procedure. Elite group translators undertook and you will managed this new translation and retranslation of the instruments.
Age. The mean age of Mexican women (Mage = 20.4, SD = 0.49) and German women (Mage = 20.8, SD = 1.0) differed statistically: t(346)= 4.29, p = 0.000. It is important to note that we expected not to find a significant difference in this variable, but a minimal difference of a few tenths (0.4) resulted in a significant one, most likely due to the large size of the total sample, since in separate structural analysis, age accounted for
Leave a Reply